lyssie: (Default)
lyssie ([personal profile] lyssie) wrote2002-12-11 01:11 am

This is gross.

Was thinking about it. Maggots eat dead flesh. Why don't they eat vampires?

And, if they do, what does that say about vampire sperm?

./..

[identity profile] abates.livejournal.com 2002-12-11 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
Wouldn't that turn them into vampire maggots? Now those would be difficult to stake. You'd need a very fine toothpick.

Doesn't sperm production need heat to work properly? and since vampires have no body heat.... mind you, being undead it probably works differently. Would they have immortal sperm? Those would be even harder to stake...

Why???

[identity profile] joshua-steele.livejournal.com 2002-12-11 06:58 am (UTC)(link)
The subject line says it all.

[identity profile] drake57.livejournal.com 2002-12-11 07:27 am (UTC)(link)
Because as we all know Vampires have no garlic in them and maggots love a bit of garlic in their meals.....what? you didn't know that?

[identity profile] unmutual.livejournal.com 2002-12-11 09:45 am (UTC)(link)
My husband, the necromancer, says that vampires are technically "undead," not "dead," and therefore not maggot food. As for the sperm, they don't produce any - their spooge is blood. Ew. Ew. Ew.

I'm so grossed out. Not by his answer, but because he didn't even have to think about it before he said it!